Solder or crimp?

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Tags :  electronics

ecu-emsLife is full of decisions, such as shall I wear the yellow or white shirt today, never thinking, of course, I have only one tie - pink! Or the classic one of betting all your money on red in a game of roulette, and the little ball ends up on the black. Sometimes, however, these decisions are taken away and life can be so much simpler. But deprived of choice, as an engineer I begin to wonder if there is a better way or if the accepted practice was just a convenience brought on by expediency with some other object or motive in mind?

One such decision to be made by anyone undertaking any form of vehicle wiring is whether to solder or crimp.

Let me start by saying that virtually without exception, the motorsport industry, the aviation industry, the automotive industry and even the marine industry all seem to adopt crimping as the norm. Safe and secure crimps produced using high-quality crimping tooling sometimes costing many hundreds of pounds and used by trained individuals to a set and closely monitored procedure can rarely be faulted. And with gauging technology to determine any wear in the tooling above an acceptable amount, it is perhaps easy to see why the industry has adopted these methods.

But ask any electronics engineer and they will readily admit that the highest quality of any electrical connection is best served using a soldered joint. After all, we still connect electronic components to a printed circuit board using solder, and if failures in these are now somewhere nearer one in 100,000 or greater, it surely can't be the actual fault of the solder. Or can it?


A typical electrical connection on a vehicle, aircraft or boat requires three things - low electrical resistance, good mechanical strength and protection against the environment. While low electrical resistance may seem to many to be the overwhelming necessity, in actuality the largest issue is likely to be one of mechanical strength. An electrical lead attached to any connector is in fact a cantilever, and like any cantilever it is therefore subject to all manner of vibration-induced bending moments. In a crimped connection, the central electrical connection will be crimped to the wire with a separate outer grip crimped to the protecting elastomer outer sheath. The former provides adequate electrical connectivity but the latter restrains the sheath.

In soldered joints the mechanical security of the joint is obtained by the 'wetting' action of the tin within the solder on the substrate beneath, but capillary action with the wire strands will draw the molten metal up away from the joint. So while we may have a perfect electrical connection, the hardened solder within the wire will create a weak point, and the wire will eventually break due to fatigue.


The application of heat, even if done so carefully, can also soften the outer sheath and may damage its properties, further impairing its flexibility. Using traditional tin-lead solders (37% lead, 63% tin) with a melting point of 183 C, soldering is difficult enough. Now that lead in solder is outlawed and a new lead-free product - tin-antimony or tin-copper, to name but two - will have to be used, this melting point will be higher, and the risk of damage to the protecting sheath therefore greater.

So it seems logical that crimping is the way to go.

And me? Well I have a copious supply of tin-lead solder and I like the apparent security of a properly soldered joint, despite the difficulties and the risk. Using crimped joints I apply just the smallest amount of solder on the first electrical crimp and use the second outer crimp for mechanical security, ensuring of course that all soldering fluxes are carefully removed afterwards. It's a bit of a 'belt-and-braces' or 'hedging my bets' approach, but it always seems to work for me. There again though, with my record in making decisions, what do I know?

Fig. 1 - A selection of inexpensive crimping tools

Fig. 2 - Solder or crimp?

Written by John Coxon

Receive articles like this direct to your inbox - Sign up to the RET-Monitor technical newsletter here.

Want more in-depth technical analysis? Race Engine Technology magazine, published 8 times a year, is the communications hub of the racing powertrain world. Subscribe today to get the knowledge that is POWER!

Leave your comment


I respectfully disagree. Solder will give two metal-to-metal transfers for the electrons to travel to. Proper crimped connections will give only one, resulting in less electrical resistance. The key here is a proper crimp. You really need the metals to be fused together by the crimping process.

Any high current engineer will tell you solder joints will not only fracture quicker, but also heat up more than properly crimped connections.

Given the quality of crimping tools used "in the field", you may be better off with soldered joints in quite a few occasions, but upgrade to proper connectors and tools and you'll win with crimp.

The fact that electronic parts are still soldered to the board has to do with the difficulty crimping them onto the board. If they could "stamp" them on with a forge like tool, I'm sure they would. They can now glue them on and use a mini-tsunami in a bath of solder to connect them all at once in the factory. Cheaper to process, quicker and less mechanically stressful on the components.
I would agree with WhizzMan.  Aerospace uses crimped pins/sockets on wires.  While I'm a mechanical guy, the reason the sparky's gave me for using crimping is that it is a more reliable and rugged connection, and it is easier to control and validate with regards to QA.  

Quality control with a purely mechanical crimped connection can be assured simply with the use of a calibrated tool.  And crimping also is easier to use with automation.  Soldering has many more variables involved, such as temperature control, thorough cleaning, proper fluxing, proper adhesion, etc.

At least that's what the EE's tell me.
I pointed out that Lambda sensor signal wires should be crimped and never soldered in my book ‘Engine Technology for the Modern World’ reviewed in RET issue 55. Here is the relevant passage explaining why:-

‘Clearly the oxygen partial pressure on the exhaust sampling side of the sensor is never likely
to exceed that on the inner control surface so there would be a gradual depletion of oxygen
within the sensor if it were totally sealed. Lambda sensors have been made with vent holes in the outer body for this reason but these can be susceptible to contamination from any of the fluids or filth likely to be found in the lower reaches of an engine bay. Fortunately the amount of oxygen required is so minute that seepage between the strands of the signal wire and its insulated sleeving has been found to be sufficient for the purpose. This does mean that anything that might seal the insulation of the wires could cause the switching action to deteriorate so it is very important that crimp connections are used rather than soldered joints when renewing or repairing sensor wires. Even use of contact cleaner spray should be avoided.’
I think the author's solution was not solder or crimp, but crimp then solder. I agree with the other comments that a crimp is superior to a soldered joint in its electrical properties, but the issue in automotive applications (particularly classic cars) is the long-term deterioration due to moisture.

In traditional soldering applications, the solder was meant to provide a seal around an already good electrical connection, therefore stopping deterioration. From this perspective, a crimped connection which is then soldered would appear to be superior.

Having said that, as pointed out by the author, there are risks of capillary action solder up the strands, hardening of the insulation, or worse - weakening of the insulation crimp leading to reduced strain relief. For these reasons, I prefer to never solder a crimp. Instead I fit a Hellermann sleeve.